Tanning Beds and Cancer

According to the Skin crabby person Foundation, on an average day, nearly thirty million the great unwashed tangent indoors in the United States (Skin Cancer Facts 2011). What is even more alarming is, a modern study has shown that hoi polloi who use lashing parlors once a month or more pay off an increase risk of developing malignant malignant melanoma by 55%. malignant melanoma is wiz of the deadliest forms of genuflect pubic louse (Skin Cancer Facts 2011). If this statistic does non frighten those who use tan beds, it should. Although a nice bronze glow accompanies your clay after your trip to the thrashing bed, a lifetime of trouble for your undress ordain follow, also.Is a nice tan really worth a lifetime of health concerns for your pargon? To many, it is be sweat of societies definition of dish aerial. Society thinks the idea of beauty involves harming their bark and receiving potential nookycer in return for laying in a bed for colour in. This needs to ch ange just as much as we need to send away the increase of skin cancer. one- flair to stop this delusional sense of beauty and to decrease the number of skin cancer patients is to exile tan beds. walloping beds should be prohibited in the U. S. ecause although you may get instant, temporary, tan skin, developing a deathly cancer called melanoma can create more permanent unpleasant health check issues and the real idea of beauty needs to be re-established. To begin, many people cause heard the term melanoma but it is important to do and understand what it is. According to the article melanoma Stage Three Prognosis, Melanoma is a cancer that forms in the melanocytes of the skin. These ar cells that make melanin, which colorations our eyes, pilus and skin (Melanoma 2011).These cells can be found in moles commonly brown or black in color, but nearlytimes pink, red, or even blue. Not only can these moles and other spots be cancerous, they can be deadly. Melanoma is one of t he deadliest cancers in America, and also one of the fastest spreading cancers (Skin Cancer Facts 2011). People do non recognize they are carriers, at that placefore do not receive adapted treatment, so it spreads to supplemental move in your body, and very quickly. This spreading is referred to as mestasis (Melanoma Stage Three Prognosis 2011).As it spreads to other parts of the body it makes for a very difficult treatment because lymph nodes start the trespass process of nearby tissue and form lesions on vital organs (Melanoma Stage Three Prognosis 2011). As a result, melanoma in the United States kills or so 8,700 unlucky people every twelvemonth (Skin Cancer Facts 2011). Also, according to the American Cancer Society, there is an estimated 120,000 new cases of melanoma in the US are diagnosed in a course of instruction (Melanoma Skin Cancer 2011). These statistics are alarming because we all could potentially make a choice to start decreasing these numbers.Using tanning beds is causing skin cancer which spreads quickly, can reach a deliver that is extremely hard to treat and could lead to death. If tanning beds were banned, there would be fewer people dying from skin cancer because people wouldnt be allowed to use them. Since using tanning beds is the number one cause of skin cancer itself, banning them should be a given. In addition to causing skin cancer, tanning beds are brainwashing people into sentiment that being tan is the new beautiful. What ever happened to natural beauty, including discolour skin?It is sad that our society has made women and men feel self-aware about their color because tanning beds offer a tan. We have started a society where kids are judged because they are not pretty and tan ilk the others. As a result, kids and adults feel self-conscious and become blue, sometimes lead to suicidal thoughts or even suicide itself, due to the lack of potency they have in themselves. If tanning beds were banned kids and adults woul d not feel self-conscious about their skin because you wouldnt be equal to tan ceaselessly without the real sun.Some say that even though tanning beds are banned, people will go on vacation and return family tan and people will feel the same way, but this color will be natural. Re-establishing the idea of natural beauty will wellbeing everybody and their confidence. Next, to prevent people from going tanning disposal officials need to ban tanning in the U. S. If people break this law, there will be federal consequences just as any other law has. cerebrate being, there are enough innocent people dying from skin cancer because of the natural sun, so by banning tanning beds we can save the lives of those who get cancer from the beds.Also, we can re-define the term beautiful so those who are self-conscious about their beautiful pale skin are confident in their natural beauty. If we enforce this new law, people will not feel as self conscious about their pale skin because there wil l be no other way to tan except by the natural sun. This will get people to realize that the natural way is the most beautiful way. In some states, there have been laws implemented to restrict minors from tanning. There have also been laws stating that you must have parent permission to be able to tan.These laws dont work because minors use fake i. d. s or have other people sign for them (Should Tanning Beds Be Banned 1995). If we enforce the new law, we can be one ill-use closer to stopping suicide caused by low self-esteem, and assisting the depressed become confident in their bodies. With all these reasons as to why there should be a ban on tanning beds comes the other view of the argument. Some people believe Imposing a ban on tanning salons would restrict the emancipate choice of consumers (Should tanning beds be banned? 1995).If consumers are given correct information about the dangers of indoor tanning, and then they should be able to weigh these risks against their own personal benefits from indoor tanning and decide for themselves if it would be a rational choice. Some say the regime should not tell consumers that they cannot assume certain risks, even if they are involuntary to do so, just because the government believes that the risks are too great (Should Tanning Beds Be Banned? 1995). Some also believe that not everyone develops cancer after visiting these salons, and consumers might be willing to take the essay (Should Tanning Beds Be Banned? 1995). People arguing against banning tanning beds believe that a ban on tanning salons would infringe the free choice rights of over one million citizens of the United States. In my opinion, the government should risk these unhappy citizens for decreasing the number of skin cancer patients. It should not matter if your choice is infringed upon because this new law will be legal transfer the lives of many. In conclusion, tanning beds cause melanoma, which can lead to death. Tanning beds have also a ided in changing the definition of beauty.If tanning beds were banned, we could stop the rise in skin cancer patients and save the lives of many. Also, we can kick upstairs those kids and adults self-esteem who still think their natural skin is beautiful despite how others who use tanning beds may make them feel. In the long run, we could trim the number of depressed and even suicidal individuals who become self-conscious because of the color of their skin. This is an important decision to make because we can reduce the number of deaths and help kids and adults realize they are beautiful the way they are.